<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Politics on Sleepy Mario</title><link>https://sleepymario.com/categories/politics/</link><description>Recent content in Politics on Sleepy Mario</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 10:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sleepymario.com/categories/politics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>It's good enough</title><link>https://sleepymario.com/2026/09/it-is-good-enough/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 10:00:00 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://sleepymario.com/2026/09/it-is-good-enough/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://sleepymario.com/2026/09/it-is-good-enough/cover.png" alt="Featured image of post It's good enough" /&gt;&lt;p&gt;All right. I wanted to write something. I &amp;lsquo;finished&amp;rsquo; my political stuff wrap-up. I think I decisively got things straight again yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This did NOT need 13-14 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, back then I simply thought:&lt;/p&gt;

 &lt;blockquote&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;I know a topic that you truly like. Here you go.&lt;/p&gt;

 &lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;rsquo;s all actually. But as per usual that got blown up. Or I don&amp;rsquo;t know what happened. I guess &amp;lsquo;pissing them off&amp;rsquo; succeeded quite spectacularly. Or something like that.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But yeah. We&amp;rsquo;ll get back to this someday. But not in the very foreseeable future. I&amp;rsquo;ll just see it like this: If without experience you can do these things on top of your head regardless of the factual accuracy, but accurate enough to have freaks continuously meddling with your life so to say, then you&amp;rsquo;ve already surpassed 99.9% of experts and politicians. At the very least. I mean who gets programs like this thrown at him/her right. You need to be very, very &amp;lsquo;special&amp;rsquo;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ll take that. I think it&amp;rsquo;s good enough.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway. We will see which ones on the list of &amp;lsquo;quite impossible but who knows&amp;rsquo; things turns out to be correct. One of them doesn&amp;rsquo;t seem so impossible to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We will see.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I consider the topic closed for the foreseeable future.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But we will return to this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Someday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Normally I don&amp;rsquo;t write like this. Apart from the usual rants on conventional bullshit obviously, but that&amp;rsquo;s different. But in this case I think you deserved it. You crossed the line a bit (aka. &amp;ldquo;way&amp;rdquo;) too much here.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>